Variable selection for propensity score estimation via balancing covariates.
نویسندگان
چکیده
We first define some notation. Let Y denote the response of interest and X denote a p-dimensional vector of covariates. Let T denote a binary indicator of treatment exposure: T = 1 if treated, T = 0 if control. (Yi,Xi, Ti), i = 1, . . . , n, is a random sample from (Y,X, T ). We further define Y (1) as the potential outcome if the subject were treated and Y (0) as the potential outcome if the subject were assigned to the control group. Depending on the type of the outcome variable, the causal estimands can be defined as the difference between Y (1) and Y (0) if Y is continuous or the odds ratio if Y is binary. We further denote the propensity score as π(X) = Pr(T = 1|X). In observational studies, π(X) is unknown and needs to be estimated from the data. Next, we briefly review the generalized boosted model (GBM) and covariate balancing propensity scores (CBPS). Both approaches estimate propensity scores by achieving balance in the covariates.
منابع مشابه
Covariate Balancing Propensity Score for General Treatment Regimes
Propensity score matching and inverse-probability weighting are popular methods for causal inference in observational studies. Under the assumption of unconfoundedness, these methods enable researchers to estimate causal effects by balancing observed covariates across different treatment values. While their extensions to general treatment regimes exist, a vast majority of applications have been...
متن کاملCovariate balance in a Bayesian propensity score analysis of beta blocker therapy in heart failure patients
Regression adjustment for the propensity score is a statistical method that reduces confounding from measured variables in observational data. A Bayesian propensity score analysis extends this idea by using simultaneous estimation of the propensity scores and the treatment effect. In this article, we conduct an empirical investigation of the performance of Bayesian propensity scores in the cont...
متن کاملBias Due to Sample Selection in Propensity Score Matching for a Supportive Housing Program Evaluation in New York City
OBJECTIVES Little is known about influences of sample selection on estimation in propensity score matching. The purpose of the study was to assess potential selection bias using one-to-one greedy matching versus optimal full matching as part of an evaluation of supportive housing in New York City (NYC). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS Data came from administrative data for 2 groups of applicants wh...
متن کاملCollaborative targeted learning using regression shrinkage.
Causal inference practitioners are routinely presented with the challenge of model selection and, in particular, reducing the size of the covariate set with the goal of improving estimation efficiency. Collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation (CTMLE) is a general framework for constructing doubly robust semiparametric causal estimators that data-adaptively limit model complexity in ...
متن کاملThe specification of the propensity score in multilevel observational studies
Propensity Score Matching (PSM) has become a popular approach to estimate causal effects. It relies on the assumption that selection into treatment can be explained purely in terms of observable characteristics (unconfoundedness assumption) and on the property that balancing on the propensity score is equivalent to balancing on the observed covariates. The PSM methodology is widely applied and ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Epidemiology
دوره 26 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015